5 Comments
User's avatar
No name's avatar

This is the first time I am not sure how to read your post…

Expand full comment
Anan Sahadei's avatar

I need a bit more information to understand your comment.

Expand full comment
No name's avatar

This is the first time when I am not entirely sure what you are trying to say.

Expand full comment
Anan Sahadei's avatar

Thanks. I think mine is a complicated message, neither positive nor negative. Zamir's talk conveyed recognition of our complex reality. I would put the message I was trying to convey briefly in bullet points:

* Zamir started by forthrightly taking responsibility. Our PM will not do so. Zamir showed leadership, which highlighted the way our PM does not.

* Zamir indicated a change in Israel's basic strategic paradigm, from absorbing a first attack to preventing it, from fighting the early battles on our territory to fighting on that of the enemy.

* Security paradigms are necessary but they have tripped us up twice, on Oct. 6, 1973 and Oct. 7, 2023. We need to hope that keeping an open mind is a permanent component of the new paradigm. I find an indication that this is the case in using the word "dynamic."

* This war is far from over. When we come to evaluate our situation, we must guard against "irrational exuberance" (to quote a source from a different time) . Most important, we must prepare ourselves psychologically to face the hardships that are coming.

Basically, Zamir delivered a grim message calling for determination on our part. He cut no corners and did not seek to spin our reality for political gain. I find that a good sign in a new IDF Chief of Staff.

Expand full comment
No name's avatar

I understood this part. The biblical reference left me hanging, but I can it was intentional. Thank you for clarifying.

Expand full comment